One of the wonderful aspects of this fibre archeology adventure besides the acquisition of artifacts is the bits and pieces of information also collected.
When I came across antimacassars on a church sale dig and consulted Oxford to check on the spelling, the dictionary also offered that the name came about (and I had wondered!) because the "small protective cover for the backs or arms of chairs…" was "Originally a protection against the Macassar oil that was used on hair."
Oxie had no listing for Macassar. Hang on a sec while I consult with Google. Ah! City in Indonesia.
I believe this is the rose pattern in Irish lace. I don't know if it is hand made – it could have been and was in company with the second one on this post and was at a sale where the parishioners tend to donate exquisite items. I like to think it was.
It has the drape of thread worked at home by hand; to me machine manufactured items seem stiffer.
This was discovered at the same sale and I would say had the same origin as the above.
Both would likely have been on plush upholstered furniture when the intent was protection.
Now they are mostly decorative.
If – when! – the time comes that the energy of a piece can be somehow interpreted and give a provenance of the item - what fun that will be.
And that definite of a link will surely enhance the contrast between what was covered then and what is being covered – the stained glass blanket, the rag bag rugs – now; which may be part of the same era.
Comments
2 responses to “Fibre archeology : antimacassars”
My mother and I believe grandmother always had a piece on the back of the chair. And I do remember it was for protection of the chair from the hair cream that the men used to wear. One of the most popular was Brylcream .. a little dab will do ya!!
Hi Linda
I caught a whiff of Brylcream at your mention of it! Interesting how smells are caught in memory, both how a fragrance can evoke the past and how a product can bring back the scent. Thanks.